Everything about Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis totally explained
The weak and the strong
Cosmic Censorship Hypotheses are two mathematical conjectures about the structure of
singularities arising in
general relativity.
Singularities that arise in the
solutions of
Einstein's equations are typically hidden within
event horizons, and therefore can't be seen from the rest of spacetime. Singularities which are not so hidden are called
naked.
The
weak cosmic censorship hypothesis conjectures that no naked singularities other than the
Big Bang singularity exist in the
universe. The hypothesis was conceived by
Roger Penrose in 1969.
Basics
Since the physical behavior of singularities is unknown, if singularities can be observed from the rest of spacetime,
causality may break down, and
physics may lose its predictive power. The issue can't be avoided, since according to the
Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems, singularities are inevitable in physically reasonable situations. Still, in the absence of naked singularities, the universe is
deterministic — it's possible to predict the entire evolution of the universe (possibly excluding some finite regions of space hidden inside event horizons of singularities), knowing only its condition at a certain moment of time (more precisely, everywhere on a
spacelike 3-dimensional hypersurface, called the
Cauchy surface). Failure of the cosmic censorship hypothesis leads to the failure of determinism, because it's impossible to predict the behavior of space-time in the causal future of a singularity. Cosmic censorship isn't merely a problem of formal interest, some form of it's assumed whenever
black hole event horizons are mentioned.
The hypothesis was first formulated by
Roger Penrose in 1969, and it isn't stated in a completely formal way. In a sense it's more of a research program proposal: part of the research is to find a proper formal statement that's physically reasonable and that can be proved to be true or false (and that's sufficiently general to be interesting).
Weak and strong cosmic censorship hypothesis
The weak and the strong cosmic censorship hypothesis are two conjectures concerned with the global geometry of spacetimes.
- The Weak cosmic censorship hypothesis asserts there can be no singularity visible from future null infinity. In other words, singularities need to be hidden from an observer at infinity by the event horizon of a black hole.
Mathematically, the conjecture states that, for generic initial data, the maximal Cauchy development possesses a complete future null infinity.
The strong cosmic censorship hypothesis asserts that, generically, general relativity is a deterministic theory, in the same sense that classical mechanics is a deterministic theory. In other words, the classical fate of all observers should be predictable from the initial data. Mathematically, the conjecture states that the maximal Cauchy development of generic compact or asymptotically flat initial data is locally inextendible as a regular Lorentzian manifold.
It should be noted that the two conjectures are mathematically independent, as there exist spacetimes for which the weak cosmic censorship is valid but the strong cosmic censorship is violated and reciprocally, there exists spacetimes for which the weak cosmic censorship is violated but the strong cosmic censorship is valid.
Problems with the concept
There are a number of difficulties in formalizing the hypothesis:
There are technical difficulties with properly formalizing the notion of a singularity.
It isn't difficult to construct spacetimes which have naked singularities, but which are not "physically reasonable;" the canonical example of such a spacetime is perhaps the "superextremal" Reissner-Nordstrom solution, which contains a singularity at that isn't surrounded by a horizon. A formal statement needs some set of hypotheses which exclude these situations.
Caustics may occur in simple models of gravitational collapse, and can appear to lead to singularities. These have more to do with the simplified models of bulk matter used, and in any case have nothing to do with general relativity, and need to be excluded.
Computer models of gravitational collapse have shown that naked singularities can arise, but these models rely on very special circumstances (such as spherical symmetry). These special circumstances need to be excluded by some hypothesis.
In 1991, John Preskill and Kip Thorne bet against Stephen Hawking that the hypothesis was false. Hawking conceded the bet in 1997, due to the discovery of the special situations just mentioned, which he characterized as "technicalities". Hawking later reformulated the bet to exclude those technicalities. The revised bet is still open, the prize being "clothing to cover the winner's nakedness".(External Link
)
Counter-example
An exact solution to the scalar-Einstein equations
where is a constant.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://cosmic_censorship_hypothesis.totallyexplained.com">Cosmic censorship hypothesis Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
